Spring Break
OP-ED:Failed satire does not reflect author's views on race or humanity
by Jonathan Rubinger
Op-Ed | 5/1/07
Posted online at 11:41 PM EST on 4/30/07
/ Last updated at 6:46 AM EST on 4/30/07
The crucial element in satire is to put the offending words in the mouth of someone who is clearly of questionable moral fiber-a famous example being Archie Bunker, the star of classic television series All In the Family. Archie was known to spout a racist or otherwise insensitive comment in his day. It was clear from the context, however, that he was not to be taken seriously or considered the voice of his writers.
Where Gravity Magazine's "BlackJerry" advertisement failed was in not making its targets -the BlackJerry company and their advocate, Chris Washington-look overtly foolish enough. Washington should be seen as irresponsible, oblivious and generally dim-witted for the material to work. He is described as being late for a flight, doing 120 mph down the Mass Pike in an obviously stolen car, stoned out of his mind from the joints his BlackJerry rolls. However, the wording used to describe this situation is insufficient in that it provides only subtle clues as to Washington's dubious nature. Even the hint that Washington is a pornography producer is rather subtle: he is named as the CEO of "3X Media" (3X media; 3x for XXX). These clues are too easily missed when the first thing one notices is a black man and a list of stereotypes that seem to apply to him.
So the "advertisement" fails in its purpose, which was to place stereotypes in the mouth of an obviously ludicrous racist, by extension saying that the stereotypes themselves-and all stereotypes, all racism, etc.-are similarly ridiculous.
Everything seems less funny when you flesh out how the humor operates. Try it with one of your favorite jokes sometime.
There may be those who question my analysis of the material. I can assure you that I know what the author intended, as I know him better than anyone.
This being the case, I offer the following: To anyone whose feelings were hurt or who felt victimized by the BlackJerry advertisement, I am truly and deeply sorry. The intended target of the ad was racism itself, and I did not make this adequately clear. There were several rewrites, and it is easy to forget that a person seeing the final edition for the first time does not have the advantage of seeing how it came about-he knows only what is directly in front of him. The final product did not clearly convey the message I was trying to send: that stereotypes are really, really dumb.
Where Gravity Magazine's "BlackJerry" advertisement failed was in not making its targets -the BlackJerry company and their advocate, Chris Washington-look overtly foolish enough. Washington should be seen as irresponsible, oblivious and generally dim-witted for the material to work. He is described as being late for a flight, doing 120 mph down the Mass Pike in an obviously stolen car, stoned out of his mind from the joints his BlackJerry rolls. However, the wording used to describe this situation is insufficient in that it provides only subtle clues as to Washington's dubious nature. Even the hint that Washington is a pornography producer is rather subtle: he is named as the CEO of "3X Media" (3X media; 3x for XXX). These clues are too easily missed when the first thing one notices is a black man and a list of stereotypes that seem to apply to him.
So the "advertisement" fails in its purpose, which was to place stereotypes in the mouth of an obviously ludicrous racist, by extension saying that the stereotypes themselves-and all stereotypes, all racism, etc.-are similarly ridiculous.
Everything seems less funny when you flesh out how the humor operates. Try it with one of your favorite jokes sometime.
There may be those who question my analysis of the material. I can assure you that I know what the author intended, as I know him better than anyone.
This being the case, I offer the following: To anyone whose feelings were hurt or who felt victimized by the BlackJerry advertisement, I am truly and deeply sorry. The intended target of the ad was racism itself, and I did not make this adequately clear. There were several rewrites, and it is easy to forget that a person seeing the final edition for the first time does not have the advantage of seeing how it came about-he knows only what is directly in front of him. The final product did not clearly convey the message I was trying to send: that stereotypes are really, really dumb.
Be the first to comment on this story