OP-ED: Center's treatment saves lives of youth
by Matthew Israel
Op-Ed | 10/9/07
Posted online at 9:47 PM EST on 10/8/07
/ Last updated at 3:55 AM EST on 10/8/07
|
Children with such behaviors are referred to nonpublic schools that often fail to treat them effectively, and eventually expel them. They are then sometimes referred for effective treatment to JRC, which has a wider range of behavioral treatment procedures than is available elsewhere.
The JRC has a unique near-zero rejection, near-zero expulsion policy, accepting students who have been rejected and expelled from other programs. The JRC's treatment, based on modern behavioral psychology, owes much to the work of psychologist B.F. Skinner, under whom I studied, and can be described as follows:
1. Under the guidance of a psychiatrist, we remove or minimize the use of psychotropic medication. JRC students have sometimes been so heavily drugged at their previous schools that they sleep most of the day, fall face-first into their food, cannot even recognize their own parents or go into a drug-induced coma. The effectiveness of such drugs is so lacking in proof and fraught with peril that the Federal Drug Administration has not approved most of them for use with children.
2. The JRC substitutes, in place of such drugs, a unique and comprehensive system of rewards-for example, an arcade-type reward room, a store where students can purchase items with the money or tokens they earn for displaying desired behaviors, a reward corner inside many classrooms, a reward afternoon with a barbecue once per week, etc.
3. JRC teaches new skills to replace the problem behaviors, making use of computerized self-instructional software that students access with their own computers.
4. The JRC tries these powerful rewards and educational procedures for an average of 11 months. For about half of our school-age students, they suffice. For the other half, we offer the parents the opportunity to supplement the rewards and educational procedures with aversives (punishments). If the parent and a probate court judge-in an individualized "substituted judgment" proceeding-approve of this plan, an aversive, in the form of a brief, two-second skin shock typically applied to the surface of an arm or leg, is added to the student's treatment and applied after each problem behavior. The procedure feels like a hard pinch and-unlike the drugs that it replaces-has no negative side effects.
Spring Break






Viewing Comments 1 - 1 of 1
TE Frazier
posted 10/27/07 @ 6:29 PM EST
I viewed your presentation at ABA and was under-whelmed with the scientific credibility of your presentation.
Punishment research in the 1970s does not validate your procedures. (Continued…)
Post a Comment