Prof penalized for alleged racist remarks
by Noah Bein and Holly Leighton
News | 11/6/07
Posted online at 9:32 PM EST on 11/5/07
/ Last updated at 9:57 AM EST on 11/5/07
|
Prof. Donald Hindley (POL) was notified of the action against him last Tuesday in a letter from Provost Marty Krauss, which he provided to the Justice.
Krauss assigned Assistant Provost Richard Silberman this week to begin attending POL144a-the Latin American politics course in which the infraction allegedly occurred-to "monitor" Hindley's lectures for speech that might violate University nondiscriminatory policy, the letters said. The University will also require Hindley to complete anti-discrimination training.
Hindley, who is in his 47th year teaching at the University, called the charges against him "ridiculous" and "totally out of the blue." He said that he has appealed to the Faculty Rights and Responsibilities Committee and that his case has been accepted.
Many students enrolled in his course voiced opposition to the sanctions. In a show of support for Hindley, a group estimated at around 13 students, about a third of the class, walked out before Hindley's lecture last Thursday. The students marched from Rabb to the Bernstein-Marcus administration building, where they met briefly with Krauss before returning to class.
"We asked to know what was going on, why we weren't informed," said Lily Adams '09, who participated in the walk-out. She added: "It's become a sort of guilty until proven innocent. There's no dissenting view or no forum for students to speak out on his behalf."
Krauss said she told the students that the process was "confidential" because "it's important that people have the courage to come forward once they have a complaint."
At least one complaint appears to have stemmed from Hindley's reference to the term "wetbacks," a derogatory expression used to describe illegal immigrants who have crossed the Mexican border. Hindley defended his discussion of the term, saying he had used it to describe racism of a certain historical period. Throughout American history, he said, "When Mexicans come north as illegal immigrants, we call them wetbacks."
Adams also denied Hindley had used the term in an offensive context. "If he had made comments that were legitimately racist, the whole class would have complained," she said, adding, "It was never him saying, 'This is what I call them,' or, 'This is an appropriate term.'"






Viewing Comments 1 - 5 of 5
KM
posted 11/06/07 @ 9:52 AM EST
I find the headline "Prof penalized for racist remarks" completely misleading. Primarily, there is absolutely no proof that the remarks were racist, were you state they were racist as fact. (Continued…)
Mary Baine Campbell
posted 11/06/07 @ 11:59 AM EST
The headline of this article is actionable. No trial has been held, no conviction achieved: the troubling situation here faced by the Administration and the university community is one in which one or more people have claimed that racist remarks were made, and others also present (Prof. (Continued…)
Sol Bernstein
posted 11/08/07 @ 2:49 AM EST
As an alum and politics major from '81, I find it absurd that Professor Hindley should be accused in this manner. He is a scholar of latin american politics, has been teaching this course for many many years (I took it over 25 years ago)and seems to be a victim of the political correctness police. (Continued…)
James Roland
posted 12/18/07 @ 7:25 AM EST
Brandeis' policing of speech is shameful. Whatever Hindley said should not have resulted in thought police monitoring his lectures. (I don't agree with his politics -- but _everyone_ needs free speech protection. (Continued…)
Lily Adams
posted 3/20/08 @ 12:46 AM EST
In the article I said that the professor was being considered "guilty until proven innocent." Let's hope he wasn't also guilty until proven innocent of having cannibal porn:
http://www. (Continued…)
Post a Comment