'(Untitled)' paints snide portrait
by Justine Root
Staff Writer
Arts | 11/17/09
Posted online at 1:12 AM EST on 11/17/09
|
So, it seemed appropriate that an artistically unaware, modern-art-mocking barbarian like myself go to see (Untitled), the new film by writers Jonathan Parker and Catherine di Napoli. (Untitled), which stars the talented likes of Adam Goldberg and Marley Shelton as eccentric artist Adrian and gallery owner Madeleine, respectively, pokes fun at the New York art scene as the film follows Adrian's attempts to further his career while carrying on a romance with Madeleine.
Unfortunately, the film puts aside plot and character development in favor of devoting the majority of its time to lampooning the art world, which makes for decent entertainment at best and for characters that are as inaccessible and static as paintings situated behind velvet ropes.
In regard to the former point, (Untitled)'s treatment of the artistically oriented ranges on the satire spectrum from being clever to being heavy-handed, but it more often nears the latter: There are no redeeming figures in (Untitled), but rather only a collection of over-the-top, borderline psychotic stereotypes (Adrian describes one artist's potential as being more in the realm of serial killing than creating art) with delusions of grandeur.
It's difficult to like such characters as is, but it's even more difficult when the only side of the characters the audience sees is the gallery-worthy public persona: Even when they're alone, characters never reveal any kind of motivation or depth, and, what's worse, the artists never undergo any growth. By the film's end, when you want to see Adrian and company creating the emotional equivalent of the Mona Lisa, they're still scribbling portraits not fit for the refrigerator.






Be the first to comment on this story